It’s my honor to exchange some thoughts as a frequent reader of the Newsletter published by JSCE Concrete Committee.
I can say that the Newsletter is very useful to readers who are dealing with concrete in their works as a designer, contractor, researcher,
and planner or even as a student. It provides not only the information on recent activities of JSCE but also useful references for practical
works and scientific research.
In the latest issue (No. 20, Jan. 2010), I read the discussion between four Japanese experts on the topic “Overseas deployment of Japanese
concrete technology: Issues and future”. This topic is very interesting to me as a person who has many chances to work and cooperate with
many Japanese contractors and researchers. I would like to participate in the discussion by looking at this given topic from a different
angle based on the actual situation in Vietnam.
Honestly, discussing only on Japanese concrete technology may be too specific for me and other readers. I would rather discuss about
Japanese construction technology in general.
In international scientific communities, the contribution of Japanese engineers
and researchers has been highly evaluated. For example, the leadership
and contribution of Japan in such international communities like Asian
concrete model code working group; Asian Concrete Federation, etc., are
remarkable.
In practical world, Japanese construction and consultant companies
are doing great works all over the world.
In Vietnam, Japan has been one of largest ODA (Official Development Assistance) contributor in recent years. In that context,
Japanese contractors with great experiences and technologies have been working very hard and making great contribution to the
infrastructure development of Vietnam. A typical example is the construction of Baichay Bridge (completed in December 2006),
the world’s longest one-plane cable-stayed bridge crossing over the world-heritage Halong Bay. These infrastructures are making
great contribution to the social economic development of Vietnam. Japanese technologies are highly evaluated by Vietnamese engineers.
Another example is the Hai Van road tunnel (completed in 2005), the longest
tunnel of this kind in Southeast Asia.
Unfortunately, aside from the above-mentioned great achievements, there are still some serious problems of safety and quality
that involve Japanese contractors when they carry out large projects in Vietnam. Recent examples are the collapse of a bridge
during construction that killed 54 people and injured many others, or serious cracking problem of concrete structure in river
crossing tunnel.
To most of the people, there is no question about Japanese construction technology, but there is a great question about how such
problems that hardly happen in Japan can befall on the famous and experienced Japanese contractors when they go abroad? It is
important to carefully analyze the actual causes and withdraw important lessons from those mistakes to avoid similar situations
in the future. One of the most important thing is to understand the local conditions including the difference in material, weather
condition, workers’ skill, local engineers’ qualification, etc., and carefully consider those differences in planning, design,
and construction.
As a person responsible for construction quality, I do expect that Japanese
advanced construction technologies will be further applied in important
infrastructure development projects in Vietnam, such as high speed train
(Shinkansen), national expressway, urban mass transportation network (metro),
nuclear power plant, etc.
I would like to discuss a little about application of Japanese standards
in construction activities in Vietnam.
|
|
For your information, Vietnam currently has more than 2000 construction-related standards and codes. Most of them are of Russian
origins since Vietnam have been strongly supported by Russia in development
of standards and codes.
Recently, foreign standards like BS, ASTM, ASHTTO, JSCE, etc., are allowed
to be used in construction projects in Vietnam as long as the safety, environment,
and quality are appropriately considered.
Regardless of the fact that many projects are carried out by Japanese contractors
and consultants, the number of projects that applied Japanese standards
is still very few. For example, ASHTTO standards are applied in design
and construction even when those projects are carried out by Japanese contractors
and funded by Japanese ODA.
My understanding is that Japanese standards (issued by JSCE, JCI,
JIS, etc.), which are crystallized products of Japanese technologies, are quite
good and can be applied to such projects. I think there are some reasons why
Japanese standards are not so popular abroad.
- Other foreign (western) standards have longer history and the language
used (English, French, etc.) is easier to understand than Japanese.
- Delayed publication of English versions: I usually received the English
version of JSCE or JCI standards two or three years after the publication
of the original Japanese version. Many sub-standards cited in main standards
are not translated into English.
- Lack of promotional activities (through joint seminar, online introduction,
political support)
- Many local factors (material, geological conditions, weather conditions,
test condition, etc.) and so much in details: Detailed description in Japanese
technical standards make it convenient for Japanese engineers when using
those standards in Japan but it is difficult (verification with local conditions
required) to apply them outside of Japan. Users have little chance to introduce
their own ideas in application.
Obviously, Japanese technical standards also
have many advantages as follows:
- Detailed description is good when used for research and in education
- Many specific topics are based on comprehensive research and practical experiences
- Frequently updated based on
newest achievement in research and reflect priceless lessons learned from
actual application
When discussing about Japanese concrete technologies, it is important to find out in which
concrete-related technologies Japan are leading in the world. Then, more efforts should be given in promoting and introducing
those technologies by all possible means. For example, Japanese can be proud of their advanced technologies in solving problems
of thermal cracking countermeasure, non-linear analysis of reinforced concrete structure, nondestructive testing, seismic design,
self-compacting concrete, etc.
Another effective approach is to export the engineer qualification system
in Japan to other countries, especially in Asian region where Japan is
playing a leading role. I think no other country has done this important
thing.
Besides, it is also important to have national strategy and more political
support to promote the Japan’s influence in terms of not only financial
support but also the construction technology.
I am
looking forward to having more chances to work with Japanese engineers and
researchers, exchanging information, knowledge, and experiences on concrete
technology. I also expect to have more information about Japanese concrete
technology through coming Newsletter of JSCE Concrete Committee.
|