“Infrastructure maintenance, renovation and management”
Promoting investment cycle for infrastructures by private
sectors based on collaboration among government, industry and
academia Cross-Ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP) |
||
Kazuo KYUMA
He completed the doctoral program at Tokyo Institute of
Technology in 1977 (Doctor of Engineering), and joined
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation in the same year. He served
in various positions there, including director of the
company's Advanced Technology R&D Center, managing executive
officer/development director, and representative executive
director/vice president. He became a full-time executive
member of the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation
of the Japan Cabinet Office in 2013, and assumed his present
position in 2014.
|
||
Yozo FUJINO
He graduated from the University of Tokyo in civil
engineering in 1972, and completed his master's degree there
in 1974. He completed the doctoral program at the University
of Waterloo in 1976 (Ph.D.). After serving as assistant at
the University of Tokyo Earthquake Research Institute, and
as assistant and lecturer at the University of Tsukuba
Institute of Structural Engineering, he served as assistant
professor at the University of Tokyo Department of Civil
Engineering, and became a professor in that department in
1990. He is now a professor emeritus of the University of
Tokyo. He assumed his present position in 2014.
|
||
|
Dialogue participants:
Kazuo KYUMA
Executive member, Council for Science, Technology and
Innovation, Japan Cabinet Office
Yozo FUJINO
Fellow, SIP Infrastructure Program Director, and Distinguished
Professor, Institute of Advanced Sciences, Yokohama National
University
Moderator:
Yoshio Tateishi
Editorial Chairman, Journal of J SCE
May 31, 2017
J SCE invited Dr. Kazuo Kyuma, who is an executive member of the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation and chairman of the governing board of the Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), and Dr. Yozo Fujino, who is Program Director (PD) of the Infrastructure Maintenance, Renovation and Management Program (SIP Infrastructure Program) and a distinguished professor at Yokohama National University, to discuss SIP, advances in research and development at the SIP Infrastructure Program, and their outlook for the future.
Government ministries and agencies
concerned with business development to promote economic
revitalization in Japan; collaborative project by industry,
academia, and government Moderator:
First, could you give us an overview of SIP and an
explanation of its goals? Kyuma:
SIP is a program that was created by the Cabinet
Office to promote innovations in science and technology,
transcending the traditional boundaries of sectors and
government ministries. It is led by the Council for Science,
Technology and Innovation (CSTI).
At its
inauguration, the second Abe Cabinet administration declared
its intention to promote innovation as a means of restoring
Japan to its position as one of the world's leading
countries. To accomplish this, it is important to break down
the barriers and promote open communication among government
ministries and agencies, and among industry, academia, and
government. In the industrial sector, companies with good
collaboration among their business divisions are strong,
while companies that are more divided are weak, even if they
are large in scale. Therefore, the decision was made to
promote this project through collaboration among government
ministries and agencies and collaboration among industry,
academia, and government.
Leaders
play an important role in this. We appointed people
representing each field from industry, universities, and
other sectors to serve as PDs for comprehensive promotion
from basic research to practical applications. SIP is a
program that was launched with the strong determination that
its scope would go beyond the establishment of basic
technologies and human resource development to include
business development as well.
The
plan was adopted in 2013, and SIP was launched as a
five-year program starting the next year. The Cabinet Office
budgeted 50 billion yen per year as funding for the
promotion of science, technology, and innovation. Of this
amount, 17.5 billion yen was earmarked for the medical and
health care sector, and the remaining 32.5 billion yen for
SIP. Because this is to continue for five years, the total
is quite an impressive sum. CSTI has been making its own
budget allocations and engaging in the entire process from
basic research to practical outcomes.
SIP is
addressing issues in a total of 11 areas, including
"enhancing resiliency against natural disasters" and
"structural materials for innovation." Dr. Fujino is PD for
the area of "infrastructure maintenance, renovation, and
management technologies."
Expanded use of ICT in infrastructure
maintenance can resolve social issues while promoting
economic growth Moderator:
What was the reasoning behind the decision to include
infrastructure as one of these issue areas? Kyuma:
Infrastructure maintenance is important in both
resolving social issues and promoting economic growth. For
example, when accidents like the Sasago Tunnel collapse and
large-scale natural disasters take place, in addition to
injuries and loss of life, there are enormous increases in
expenditures amid Japan's current financial difficulties.
Therefore, it truly serves the national interest to deal
with these kinds of problems in advance in order to improve
people's safety and security and minimize the damage.
In
addition, I have high expectations for the industrialization
of these infrastructure maintenance techniques. I hope that
the maintenance technologies established through SIP will be
utilized in industrial development when these technologies
are exported to emerging countries that will experience
similar needs to those of Japan in the future. Fujino:
At first, I was surprised when I heard that the
Cabinet Office was going to get involved in infrastructure.
However, I myself had experienced joint research with
private companies in another industry for almost 10 years in
the past, and when I found out that this program would
involve cross-ministerial collaboration and collaboration
among industry, academia, and government, I felt intuitively
that this is definitely a subject to be addressed with
regard to infrastructure. That was why I applied to become
the PD. Kyuma:
It is not feasible for infrastructure maintenance to
be handled by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism and the construction industry alone.
For example, in bridge inspection, a bridge is checked and
measured to detect deterioration, the findings are analyzed,
and based on the results, a decision is made to continue
routine maintenance, perform repairs, or replace the bridge.
That series of system operations requires knowledge of not
only civil engineering, but also electronic engineering,
information engineering, measurement engineering, and
materials engineering. That is why it's important to gather
top-notch scientists from each area to solve problems
together.
The rigor of strict evaluations by a
governing board Moderator:
What is the system by which the results of SIP are
evaluated? Kyuma:
The governing board, which consists of the eight
executive members of CSTI, holds meetings as needed with
participation from outside experts as well, and provides
advice and evaluations in all of the issue areas. I am the
chairman of the governing board, and I provide the
evaluators with criteria to use in conducting strict
evaluations.
The
evaluation criteria include specific plans and roadmaps from
basic research to practical application, and the evaluators
determine whether steady progress is being made in
accordance with those guidelines. Budget allocation for the
next fiscal year is based on the evaluation results, and
programs earning a high score may get a 20% or 30% increase
while programs with a low score may see their funding cut by
half.
Every
PD is highly qualified, and if a PD receives a lower
evaluation one year, they will revise their organization
based on the evaluation results and advice, improve their
program, and achieve better results by the next year.
Therefore, the evaluation mechanism of SIP seems to be
functioning well. This is the first national project ever
implemented in Japan that provides such thorough evaluation
and follow-up for programs. Moderator:
Have any issue areas actually been discontinued? Kyuma:
We have never discontinued an entire program, but
several projects within the programs have been ended.
This
kind of mechanism for strict evaluation is normal in the
industrial sector, and companies cannot be successfully
managed without it. The areas and roles are clearly defined
in SIP, unlike other existing national projects and national
R&D programs. The goal should be comprehensive promotion
from fundamental research to practical outcomes, and it is
important to be tuned into the practical applications of
research findings. If a project has no prospects of leading
to practical applications, its evaluation will naturally be
lower. Moderator:
Please explain the organizational framework of the
SIP Infrastructure Program. Fujino:
There are about 60 themes under the SIP
Infrastructure Program, a much greater number than the other
issue areas under SIP (Table 1). That is because it covers
such a wide range; for example, just in the area of
inspection technologies, the themes include the use of
drones and robots and development of new materials. Based on
the development of a large number of individual
technologies, the concept is ultimately to integrate them in
ways that are useful for infrastructure management (Fig. 1).
There
are about 1,200 participants, and it's not always easy to
properly get one's ideas across to everyone. Therefore, we
hold outcome strategy meetings to gather everyone together
once every few months and hear each other's status reports.
The goal is for the governing board to share the advice and
evaluations that we have received in order to strengthen the
sense of solidarity and address the issues with serious
resolve. Publishing research findings in journals is not the
main purpose. To demonstrate that we have spent taxpayers'
money effectively, we need to stay focused on practical
outcomes and make sure that the research findings are
utilized. That has been our approach in the past, and we
will continue to maintain this emphasis in the future.
Table
1. List of Themes under the SIP Infrastructure Program
(http://www.jst.go.jp/sip/k07.html)
|
|
PDF ver... |